Hi
Given the many false starts I had with FTM, I can only second these
news sound great, indeed. I hope being able to follow the dynamic,
this time.
Best,
Julien
Le 12 juil. 2010 à 23:33, Pascal Baltazar <pb@zkrx.org> a écrit :
> Hi !
>
> That sounds great !
>
> I also wanted to mention that Diemo and Théo will spend a couple day
> s at the end of the month (possibly 29th + 30th) working on Jamoma 0
> .6 prototyping in relation to FTM...
>
> I will spend a couple days too (25-28th) working with Diemo on
> CataRT, probably with some Jamoma integration
>
> So that all sounds like a great dynamics starting around these
> subjects..
>
> Best,
>
> p
>
> On 12 Jul 2010, at 22:55, Trond Lossius wrote:
>
>> Hi Adrian,
>>
>> thanks for the fix, I have committed it to the master branch now. I
>> have also set you up as developer for most of the Redmine projects,
>> If you need additional permissions, please let me know.
>>
>> Your help will be much welcome in the project, as will
>> contributions towards documentation. If you have additional patches
>> to contribute, using Redmine as you did this time is a easy way of
>> doing so. Alternatively, if you are aquatinted with GIT, you might
>> want to download Jamoma from GIT and build, and we could give you
>> permissions to work on the repositories that you would be
>> interested in contributing towards.
>>
>> Regarding Jamoma and FTM, the project that am (or should be)
>> working on, deals with how to use FTM for high level storing and
>> controlling of Jamoma modules, by querying modules for their states
>> or tracking changes over time, storing the information as FTM data
>> structures, and then be able to operate on it. I am planning to
>> keep working on that during this summer. I think that it might also
>> be interesting to create an extended version of jcom.parameter that
>> would be able to maintain FTM objects as parameters. That should
>> probably go into a UserLib to avoid a general dependence of Jamoma
>> on FTM. That might be a more ambitious project, but could be quite
>> useful.
>>
>> Your input in the process will definitively be useful, and the
>> module(s) you are working on sounds highly interesting. Tom Stoll
>> have been porting parts of CataRT to Jamoma, so there might be some
>> interesting possibilities in connecting the various initiatives at
>> some point.
>>
>> Best,
>> Trond
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jul 11, 2010, at 4:25 AM, Adrian Gierakowski wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Trond,
>>>
>>> Just wanted to let you know that I updated the Bug #532 on
http://redmine.jamoma.org/issues>>>
>>> It is the first time I am contributing something to jamoma and I
>>> don't know exactly how things work. I submitted a corrected
>>> version of a help patch that wasn't working properly but I didn't
>>> close the case since I don't know when is a case considered to be
>>> closed. Should the corrected file be submitted to the repository
>>> somehow? I have a "report" status so I guess I wouldn't be able to
>>> do it anyway.
>>>
>>> I do not have much experience with programming in C, C++ and so
>>> on, but I do have with max so I am happy to contribute to thing
>>> like the above case or maybe write some modules and contribute to
>>> the documentation.
>>>
>>> Btw. I read somewhere on the web that you are involved with trying
>>> to integrate ftm and jamoma. I am really into that since I am
>>> currently working on a personal project (a generalized granulator)
>>> using jamoma and ftm and I could contribute from a point of view
>>> of an end user and patch/module designer. At what stage is the
>>> whole project (or idea) anyway?
>>>
>>> Best wishes.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Adrian Gierakowski
>>>
>>
>